JUSTICE RANGANATH MISHRA COMMISSION REPORT PDF

Advanced full-text search Advanced catalog search Search tips Full view only. Create your own Private Collection by searching or browsing to find items of interest and then adding them to a collection. Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against ranganatth community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Featured Today In Travel.

Author:Femuro Goltirn
Country:Colombia
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Literature
Published (Last):5 June 2008
Pages:346
PDF File Size:5.12 Mb
ePub File Size:17.92 Mb
ISBN:304-3-95643-632-7
Downloads:76868
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader:Kigul



A tough inquiry would have caused important heads to roll. He had once referred to the riots as a "dead issue," and had argued against "opening up old wounds. We were never really given a chance to participate in it as we had been promised.

The CJC alleged that the Commission was failing to protect witnesses who were testifying on behalf of the victims, that the witnesses were subjected to continuing threats and intimidation and that the commission was conducting its affairs in such secrecy that no independent evaluation was possible.

Said V. Tarkunde, retired judge of the Bombay High Court: "We did not feel there was any point in our participating any more. This has been a one-sided investigation. We were never given a chance to participate in it as we had been promised. Gupta, secretary to the commission, offered "no comment" while Justice Mishra could not even be approached for a response. The CJC had got more than affidavits from victims alleging participation by the police and politicians in the carnage.

Sikri, Lt. Aurora, and journalist Khushwant Singh. Aurora Relations between the Commission and the committee had never been cordial. From the start, CJC members claimed that the independent investigation agency headed by a junior superintendent of police from Orissa appointed by the commission was not powerful enough to undertake investigations involving senior government officials and politicians.

In addition, while the CJC produced hundreds of witnesses who have been subjected to rigorous cross-examination within the commission, "not one officer from the government or the Delhi administration has been invited to step into the witness box," the CJC petition said. And even though a total of some 2, affidavits have supposedly been filed until now, "no copy of any of the affidavits filed by people other than CJC witnesses has been provided to the CJC for scrutiny.

Another request that nine senior government officials responsible for maintaining law and order during the riots be summoned was turned down on the grounds that their statements had already been recorded by the commission. In fact, only five of the nine had been examined by the commission. Their identities were not disclosed and their statements were not made available.

In addition, "the same police officers against whom allegations of intimidation and harassment had been made by the witnesses were entrusted the task of investigating the allegations. Members said the decision had not been taken in haste, and that it had been contemplated for several months.

Said Gen. Aurora: "From the beginning, the terms of reference of the Commission were biased against the victims. The investigation did not go to the victims, the victims were forced to come to the investigation with the burden of proof on them. But when the commission does give its final report, it may find that it has few takers. Get real-time alerts and all the news on your phone with the all-new India Today app.

ASTROCARYUM MURUMURU PDF

Rangnath Commission recommends 10% quota for Muslims

A tough inquiry would have caused important heads to roll. He had once referred to the riots as a "dead issue," and had argued against "opening up old wounds. We were never really given a chance to participate in it as we had been promised. The CJC alleged that the Commission was failing to protect witnesses who were testifying on behalf of the victims, that the witnesses were subjected to continuing threats and intimidation and that the commission was conducting its affairs in such secrecy that no independent evaluation was possible. Said V.

ESPERANZA NUMERO EQUIVOCADO ELENA PONIATOWSKA PDF

Ranganath Misra

.

LA VIDA DE LOS HOMBRES INFAMES MICHEL FOUCAULT PDF

The Curious case of Justice Ranganath Misra who gave clean chit to Congress for 1984 Sikh massacre

.

Related Articles