Oxford Philosophical Texts Description The Oxford Philosophical Texts series consists of authoritative teaching editions of canonical texts in the history of philosophy from the ancient world down to modern times. Each volume provides a clear, well laid out text together with a comprehensive introduction by a leading specialist, providing the student with detailed critical guidance on the intellectual context of the work and the structure and philosophical importance of the main arguments. Endnotes are supplied which provide further commentary on the arguments and explain unfamiliar references and terminology, and a full bibliography and index are also included. The series aims to build up a definitive corpus of key texts in the Western philosophical tradition, which will form a reliable and enduring resource for students and teachers alike.
|Published (Last):||12 November 2005|
|PDF File Size:||12.46 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Summary[ edit ] Mill took many elements of his version of utilitarianism from Jeremy Bentham , the great nineteenth-century legal reformer, who along with William Paley were the two most influential English utilitarians prior to Mill.
Like Bentham, Mill believed that happiness or pleasure, which both Bentham and Mill equated with happiness was the only thing humans do and should desire for its own sake. Since happiness is the only intrinsic good, and since more happiness is preferable to less, the goal of the ethical life is to maximize happiness. This is what Bentham and Mill call "the principle of utility" or "the greatest-happiness principle. More recent utilitarians often deny that happiness is the sole intrinsic good, arguing that a variety of values and consequences should be considered in ethical decision making.
In particular, Mill tried to develop a more refined form of utilitarianism that would harmonize better with ordinary morality and highlight the importance in the ethical life of intellectual pleasures, self-development, high ideals of character, and conventional moral rules. In Chapter 1, titled "General Remarks," Mill notes that there has been little progress in ethics.
Since the beginning of philosophy, the same issues have been debated over and over again, and philosophers continue to disagree sharply over the basic starting points of ethics. Mill argues that these philosophical disputes have not seriously damaged popular morality, largely because conventional morality is substantially, though implicitly, utilitarian.
He concludes the chapter by noting that he will not attempt to give a strict "proof" of the greatest-happiness principle. Like Bentham, Mill believed that ultimate ends and first principles cannot be demonstrated, since they lie at the foundation of everything else that we know and believe.
Nevertheless, he claims, "[c]onsiderations may be presented capable of determining the intellect,"  which amount to something close to a proof of the principle of utility. In the second chapter, Mill formulates a single ethical principle, the principle of utility or greatest-happiness principle, from which he says all utilitarian ethical principles are derived: "The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.
By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. These include charges that utilitarianism: is a doctrine worthy only of swine for holding that pleasure is the only thing that is desirable for its own sake p.
He notes that most people who have experienced both physical and intellectual pleasures tend to greatly prefer the latter. Few people, he claims, would choose to trade places with an animal, a fool, or an ignoramus for any amount of bodily pleasure they might thereby acquire. And since "the sole evidence it is possible to produce that something is desirable, is that people do actually desire it,"  it follows that intellectual pleasures e. Normally we should follow such "secondary principles" without reflecting much on the consequences of our acts.
As a rule, only when such second-tier principles conflict is it necessary or wise to appeal to the principle of utility directly. He explores a variety of ways in which both external and internal sanctions — that is, the incentives provided by others and the inner feelings of sympathy and conscience — encourage people to think about how their actions affect the happiness of others. The ultimate sanction, Mill claims, is internal.
Humans are social animals who naturally desire "to be in unity with our fellow creatures. In the fourth chapter Mill offers his famous quasi-proof of the greatest-happiness principle. The core of his argument is this: Everyone desires happiness. The only proof that something is desirable is that people do actually desire it.
Therefore, the general happiness is a good to the aggregate of all persons. In such cases, is the general happiness a good to those individuals? Other critics have questioned whether it makes sense to speak of aggregates as having desires,  or whether the fact that something is desired proves that it is desirable. Critics of utilitarianism often claim that judging actions solely in terms of their effects on the general happiness is incompatible with a robust respect for individual rights and a duty to treat people as they deserve.
Largely owing to Mill, utilitarianism rapidly became the dominant ethical theory in Anglo-American philosophy.
John Stuart Mill
Biografia[ modifica modifica wikitesto ] Essays on economics and society, Tra il e il fu rettore della University of St. Nel fu anche padrino del piccolo Bertrand Russell. Mill infatti, riteneva che solo le leggi di produzione fossero leggi naturali, e quindi immutabili, mentre considerava le leggi di distribuzione come una fenomenologia etico - politica , determinate da ragioni sociali e, quindi, modificabili. Inoltre Stuart Mill ammette un uso strumentale del protezionismo , quando questo sia funzionale a consentire ad una "industria bambina" di svilupparsi fino al punto da poter competere con le industrie estere, momento in cui le protezioni vanno rimosse.
Online Library of Liberty
Summary[ edit ] Mill took many elements of his version of utilitarianism from Jeremy Bentham , the great nineteenth-century legal reformer, who along with William Paley were the two most influential English utilitarians prior to Mill. Like Bentham, Mill believed that happiness or pleasure, which both Bentham and Mill equated with happiness was the only thing humans do and should desire for its own sake. Since happiness is the only intrinsic good, and since more happiness is preferable to less, the goal of the ethical life is to maximize happiness. This is what Bentham and Mill call "the principle of utility" or "the greatest-happiness principle.